In a new series of posts I will utilise the Cognitive Shield app and Pscychoanaltic Engine to analyse the framing of political posts to pull them apart.
Trump post on the 2020 election "Zero Border crossings for the month for TRUMP, verses 60,000 for Sleepy, Crooked Joe Biden, a man who lost the 2020 Presidential Election by a “LANDSLIDE!” Biden was grossly incompetent, and the 2020 election was a total FRAUD! The evidence is MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING. A Special Prosecutor must be appointed. This cannot be allowed to happen again in the United States of America! Let the work begin! What this Crooked man, and his CORRUPT CRONIES, have done to our Country in 4 years, is grossly indescribable! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Jun 20, 2025 at 2:34 PM.
The Cognitive Shield
Comprehensive Analysis:
Overall Summary:
The text serves as a highly charged political provocation intended to delegitimize the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election and the current Biden administration while promoting Donald Trump as the superior leader, specifically regarding border security.
NLP (AI) Driven Analysis:
Sentiment/Tone: Sensationalist
Key Themes/Keywords: border crossings, 2020 election, fraud, Trump vs Biden, MAGA, corruption
Framing Type: Manipulative
Political Leaning: Right
NLP (Human) Principles Applied:
Communication Style: authoritative and hyperbolic, utilizing kinesthetic metaphors like 'landslide' and 'massive' to create a sense of physical weight to the claims.
Values/Beliefs Targeted: security, justice, patriotism, distrust of institutions
Meta-Programs Engaged: Away From, External Reference, Mismatching
Behavioral Economics Analysis:
Biases Exploited: Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, Authority Bias, Availability Heuristic
Influence Tactics: fear-mongering and creating a false consensus through the use of extreme adjectives and capitalization to simulate urgency and certainty.
Audience & Author Analysis:
Psychographic Profile (Audience): Strong nationalist identity, high distrust of federal agencies/mainstream media, and a value system centered on traditional strength and border integrity.
Psychometric Profile (Audience): Likely high in Conscientiousness regarding social order but high in Openness to alternative/conspiratorial narratives that challenge the status quo.
Behavioral Profile (Audience): Individuals likely to engage in high-conflict political discourse, consume partisan media, and prioritize nationalistic policies.
Author's Psychological Profile: Highly assertive, exhibiting black-and-white thinking, narcissistic communication patterns, and a confrontational interpersonal style.
Author's Intentions: To mobilize political support, incite outrage against the current administration, and reinforce the 'stolen election' narrative among the base.
Lacanian Psychoanalytic Analysis:
Imaginary Engagement: It presents an idealized Imaginary past (Trump's era) versus a fragmented, chaotic present (Biden's era) to foster a cohesive group identity.
Symbolic Engagement: The text attempts to rewrite the Symbolic order by redefining the law and the outcome of the 2020 election as 'FRAUD', thereby challenging the legitimacy of the Great Other (the State).
Real Engagement: It touches upon the 'Real' of national insecurity and economic anxiety, attempting to symbolise this trauma through the specific scapegoat of 'Crooked Joe'.
Desire/Jouissance Aspects: The text exploits the 'jouissance' of the victim narrative, offering the audience a repetitive, pleasurable anger derived from being 'cheated' by a corrupt 'Other'.
Fact-Checking Analysis:
False. The claim that Donald Trump had 'zero' border crossings is factually incorrect; encounters occurred every month of his presidency. The claim that Joe Biden lost the 2020 election by a 'landslide' or that it was a 'fraud' is false, as the results were certified by all 50 states and upheld by numerous court rulings and audits.
Hate Speech Detection:
Not Detected
Overall Explanation:
This text is a textbook example of political propaganda that utilizes cognitive biases and emotional manipulation to bypass critical thinking. By using extreme contrast (0 vs 60,000) and authoritative declarations of 'massive evidence,' it seeks to create a psychological reality for the reader that contradicts documented facts. The analysis reveals a strategic attempt to use the 'Real' of border anxiety to dismantle the 'Symbolic' legitimacy of the U.S. electoral system.
